![]() |
The Accomplisht Cook |
||||||
| Robert May
540 pp; 210x148mm; illustrations; paperback ISBN 0907325 98X £16.99
|
Encouraged by Frances Bissell's recent statement that Robert
May's was her favourite cookery book, I thought of the very small number
I printed of the hardback version of this facsimile in 1994. There is no
more important 17th-century work: written after a lifetime's professional
experience; receptive to, but not dominated by foreign in-fluence; a master
of the colourful recipe; prefaced by a cook's biography; 'a prototype of
the modern cookery book' that excludes medical recipes, covers the whole
gamut of cookery and includes illustrations to clarify points in the text.
This is a facsimile of the 1685 edition, incorporating Robert May's last
amendments from 1665. There is a useful biographical introduction, a graceful
foreword by Alan Davidson, and a full glossary.
A superglossary is also available on this web site. |
||||||
| PAPERBACK EDITION
This is a facsimile edition of the masterpiece of Restoration cookery by Robert May, first published in 1660 - but this is a reproduction of the last revision made in the author's lifetime (1665, reprinted in 1635). It was the most important cookery book of its time: straddling the period of the Civil War and Restoration, when English cookery was for the first time influenced by the high cooking of the French court and aristocracy. Robert May was a professional cook (most recipe books of the period were from the pens of amateurs, or women, or reproduced household collections). He had trained in Paris. He had worked for a succession of noble families, mostly (like him) of the Catholic faith. As well as a matchless collection of recipes, the original book also
contained a memoir of the author. There is a modern introduction which
offers new facts about May's life and work; and there is a useful glossary
of words, terms and materials.
This book will appeal to the enthusiast of cookery history. It is one of the essential texts for the period. A more general readership is unlikely. There will, however, because it appeals to the scholar in many cookery writers, be much mention of it in the various food columns of the national press. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||