Roy Dommett and Abingdon
Roy Dommett CBE
10 Attlee Gardens
Church Crookham
Fleet
Hampshire GU13 0PH
Tel (01252) 617229
30th October 1997
Too many comments are circulating which show
little awareness of historical fact.
My Involvement
I danced regularly with Abingdon from September 1960 until 1970/1, at every
event until the very late 1960's, the last time I believe being by
invitation to an early twin town ceremony, supporting the team through a
very difficult period during which they could otherwise have collapsed
completely. I was invited and was not looking to join. I first saw the team
dance through Frank Purslow, to whom I had been introduced by Reg Hall. I
felt close to the old men, I found that my father, Jack Hyde and Arnold
Woodley had worked together briefly at Pressed Steel by Oxford recovering
scrap near the end of WWII. My family grew up with a background of the
Abingdon Morris. Three of my sons, Simon, Michael and Stephen danced with
them at various times to help make up a team.
Naturally, I dropped out as soon after the club was viable due to an influx
of younger men, as the tradition properly belongs to the truly local people.
I still have a letter from Colin Corner thanking me for my part in teaching
the dances. The involvement with Abingdon actually started my hobby of
filming and recording live morris because of the all too obvious risk at the
time that the side would not survive and that no one else was bothering. The
cost involved was met at some personal and family sacrifice. There is no
lack of recording today as the equipment is readily available. We then
bought a car in order to attend practices once the Radley to Abingdon branch
line closed down. I was not involved at all with teaching the Abingdon
dances to the local schools, Dr Bernardo's or the Town Womens' Guild,
because of the transport difficulties, but I did help Jack with the Rover
Scouts at Longworth, five of whom later joined the club.
Each year I helped out at canvassing, and sometimes vote counting at
Mayor's Day. I was present when it was finally agreed what was to be
the form of Maid of the Mill, what was to be the
"recovered" version of Constant Billy,
and when Jack worked out at a practice what was to become the
Duke of Marlborough dance.
The Recording
A team has to be aware of its own history.
Those Abingdon dances then in practice were described by Major Fryer and
published within the then small Morris Ring in the late 1930's. The Major
wrote regular letters to then Morris Ring officials about the happenings and
politics at Abingdon and I assume that this story is accessible out there
somewhere. He always kept copies of correspondence. In the early 1960's when
interviewing outsiders I saw several sets of notations still existing. At
that time with the help of the older Abingdon men I produced a stencilled
description for the Morris Ring Advisory Council as one of the documents
considered in preparation of a case for publishing the known morris dance
material, as an example of something with which they were unfamiliar. Copies
of these sheets were later used by Jack Hyde to help newcomers to the
Abingdon team. I had separate discussions with Douglas Kennedy, the then
Director of the EFDSS, and its policy of not formally publishing traditional
material whilst a team was still active, even in an archival journal, was
clearly stated and accepted by all concerned. Peter Kennedy had made an
audio tape of the Abingdon Morris in the 1950's which I presume is still
available commercially from Folktapes, as one of 300 advertised.
All the material that I and Reggie Annets, his man servant, were able to
rescue from Major Fryer's papers, which his brother Charles Fryer, set out
to burn, were passed or copied to Jack Hyde and I assume exist in the
Abingdon team archives and hopefully nowhere else. Jack said, for example,
that they answered a number of questions he had had about what happened
between Percy and Major Fryer. Unfortunately we were unable to preserve
Percy Hemmings', a former bagman, material as he had kept it all in a garden
shed for many years and it was so weather spoiled as to be unreadable. We
had a meeting with him, involving the then current older dancers, to explore
the history of the team through the late 30's and early 40's.
There had been an arrangement with the older men in the early 60's for them
to teach the Abingdon dances at a Ring Instructional at Cecil Sharp House
which only fell through on the day. It had often been expressed by Jack Hyde
and his friends that they would have liked to have seen an Abingdon dance
like the Squire's Dance done as a massed display. These men had
hosted two Ring Meetings and always attended such meetings that could be
reached in those days when several of them did not finish work on Saturdays
until noon. These men gave their dances Princess Royal and
Maid of the Mill to one of the Oxford teams to dance, for some
reason, presumably OUMM as I never remember Oxford City doing them out when
not dancing with Abingdon. I also remember seeing about that time another
side dancing Abingdon's Jockey to the Fair. Maurice Sutherland,
who had also danced with Abingdon before my time, spoke of other teams doing
Princess Royal, and the Wargrave Morris Men, like Reggie
Annets, knew all the repertoire, and were one source of information about
how the dances had been recovered earlier. The Vaughan Williams Memorial
Library at Cecil Sharp House has some cine film of Abingdon dances in its
archive.
When I assisted in the writing and publishing of Dr Bacon's Handbook, he
wrote formally to the Abingdon side about potential publication and accepted
without any argument the expressed desire not to have the Abingdon dances
published or described any further, and the statements in the Handbook
reflect this understanding. It should have noticed from the material that I
never attempted to take my writing about the dances any further than they
had been in the mid-1960's and the bulk of what I have remains unorganised,
and probably quite a bit of relevant information is now forgotten. So what
others can have accessed from archives is a poor description that is
fragmented. During the 1970's I was too occupied with my job to be involved
in folk dance and morris. I have not passed much of the Abingdon material to
more recent investigators, such as Keith Chandler, but only that
specifically relevant to their research topics. However some of what has
been said in recent years by the Abingdon men about the dances and their
origins is wrong, although I have never thought that it really mattered
enough to comment.
One of the purposes of Dr Bacon's Handbook was to make 385 dances available,
even where it involved much reconstruction of limited surviving evidence,
instead of the only 80 published before, so that pressure could be taken off
the traditions. At various times I have heard both Bampton and Headington
Quarry men express their disquiet at the use of their dances by others and
wished that their own traditions could be left and not emulated so slavishly
nor quarried so quickly by outsiders. This is of course the price of
becoming meccas for the morris world, but without the interest the
traditions would have probably not survived. None appears to have refused TV
appearances or Festival invitations and all have enjoyed the lauding.
I used what influence I may have had in the 1960's and early 70's to
persuade outsiders that the Abingdon tradition was authentic and worthwhile,
at a time when many Cotswold dancers thought it all rather simple and not
worth taking it at all seriously. I still believe that I had something to do
with its gradual acceptance as a genuine traditional side with all the
respect due to it. I continue to speak well of Abingdon and its traditions.
I reflected in good faith what I have been told or experienced, although I
know I could have been misinformed or have misunderstood.
I respected the wishes of the Abingdon team not to be filmed in the 1970's
and 80's and gave up coming to Mayor's Day, to my great regret, thinking
that the club's cohesion was more important than mere personal interests or
the justice of the situation. I still have a pair of 400ft spools of 8mm
cine film from the period during which I danced, so the prohibition was not
that embarrassing.
The club's problem with the Hemmings family was unfortunate for me as most
of my surviving friends in the team went to dance with Mr Hemmings Morris, a
most proper expression of the tradition. I was drawn into discussions with
the media by them. Athough I attempted to calm people down on one side,
there was little that I could do except report to the outside morris world
officials what appeared to be happening. I have with Mr Hemming's Morris
permission filmed them a few times for archival purposes. It was always
assumed that their team would have a finite life, but it now looks as if a
new generation will be recruited.
Attitudes
We presumably differ in that I believed that genuine morris dancers should
have some knowledge of the width of the morris for the sake of the health of
morris in general, but not necessarily by public reproduction, and that
little was gained by secrecy, or imagining that the public, on which even
the tradition depends, attempts to distinguish between the
"tradition" and the rest. If this is not true then there is
nothing to worry about. Whether we like it or not the acceptance of the
morris in any part of the country is determined by the behaviour and
attitudes of all the teams. It is probably too much to hope that outsiders
would grasp all the significance of tradition, but they can be expected to
respect the past, present and future of the morris. My forty years
experience shows me that teams with "wrong" attitudes do not last
and that their long term impact is minimal.
It is sad that no one from Abingdon or elsewhere has felt it necessary to
approach me to discuss any aspect of the past or present as it affects the
Abingdon Morris over the last twenty five years. A reasonable record of
attempts at direct communication would make the case more plausible. Just a
copy of a circular is an insult. I find that discovering views third or
fourth hand with all the possible misunderstandings and deliberate
distortions involved is hardly the basis for determining my own actions or
what I should say to others. I love the Abingdon tradition and care greatly
for those that passed it onto us. If I had ever raised my own men's team
amongst friends, I would have been very tempted to base it on the Abingdon
dances. Frank Purslow had at one time set out down, with agreement, such a
route with the proposed plan for a Primrose Hill Morris in Campden Town,
London, before he moved to live and work in Bampton.
Some of the comments reported from Abingdon men since I left both belittle
and denigrate other morris dancers, implying that such do not or cannot
care or have sympathy with tradition. As Keith Chandler regularly points
out, today's morris world, including the tradition, has little in common
with the past. Yet there are very many around who do care about the morris
today, and are proud that teams such as Abingdon continue to exist.
For many years I have held a clear attitude about the traditional morris,
and I quote from my occasional lectures, (with recent interpolations in
[ ])
"It is commonly, properly and ethically accepted that certain dances
are the "property" of the performers. Some of dances, such as the
Great Wishford Faggot dance [,Abotts Bromley Horn
dance,] and the Bacup nuts, are so distinctive that even
when avoiding the actual movements in the original any exploitation of the
form is recognised as a copy, rather as are any attempts at the late Wilson,
Keppel and Betty's Egyptian Sand Dance.
[Yet the archives mention other nutters in the
past.] The existence of most of the older living
traditions is precarious, and the use of their material can be life
threatening. Often dances have been collected on understandings as that
either they are passed on or are kept within a particular group. Such wishes
have to be respected. Some dances are recovered or reconstructed only with
great difficulty and the collectors have some "rights" in
obstructing their further uncontrolled propagation. However also to be
avoided is over protection. There is a danger that to guard for example the
[simple] Bacup garland dances
the exploitation of the quadrille formation for other dances is inhibited.
Contact with the tradition is a two way process, it is inspirational to
those without their own inherited dances, and it helps to provide the
interest that has kept the tradition alive. A caring and sensitive approach
is required, although it has to be said that some urban sides do not
understand it."
The ephemeral performing arts are in a different category to the fine arts.
Rights are attenuated by public performance, by claims of ancientness, and
by teaching or otherwise sharing by anyone at any time in the past.
In any case the unilateral statement by the Abingdon Club on the status of
the dances is incomplete and needs some extension. I would suggest that
something like the following is added:
"In the past Abingdon's dances have been taught by members of the side to
local groups for specific occasions, as is their privilege. This was never
intended to signal a general licence, but a recognition of the belonging of the
tradition to the town.
"Archival records are not resisted, but the dances are not for general or
specific performance except by previous agreement with all the
members of the club, and should be so clearly labelled.
"Existing known records of the dances are incomplete and not an
accurate reflection of current or recent performance.
"In the event of the demise of the morris tradition at Abingdon, it is
the desire that the dances remain dead until such time that they can be
revived locally."
I must point out that an alternative line was taken by the traditional long
sword teams, in a little different situation, over their dances when it was
proposed that Ivor Allsop published the known material. He was asked to
ignore the more recent changes to the dances made within the tradition. The
equivalent here would be publish the Sharp, Neal, Fryer and Kennedy tunes
and notations, which are easily accessible by anyone.
I believe that I have acted in good faith, within the acceptable limits
given by my direct contacts, particularly with the old dancers, and have
caused far less problems for the local tradition than some of the antics of
those active in the club or who act as friends. The worst aspect to me is
that the manner of the fuss makes the current holders of the tradition
appear foolish and it depreciates the gift and heritage that is uniquely
theirs. That a concern is expressed must imply that the local tradition is
at a low ebb. Externalisation of a threat is a common response to internal
difficulties. I wish The Abingdon Ock St Morris well and hope for recovery
and a moving on to fresh achievements.