The Death Penalty in Britain
|
| I had to check the last pages of some of the classic crime fiction on my shelves. I had a feeling that an awful lot of them closed with the words "(the murderer) was tried and paid the penalty for his crimes upon the scaffold" just before the final printed text that said "The End". In fact, most don't - golden age detectives may identify the murderer in book after book, but as critics at the time, and even the professional police pointed out (as in the Detection Club's Six Against The Yard where six authors had their stories criticised by police officers) most authors had very little idea of what was evidence of a forensic legal standard. Perhaps realising that risk few authors identified what happened after the murderer was exposed. I had mis-remembered.
|
| per year in the period 1900 - 1949 | 13 |
| per year in the decade 1930 - 1939
("The figure for the 1930s was the lowest of any decade in the century" - Potter) |
8.2 |
| in the years 1940-1946 | 13.3 |
All those executed in the period would have been convicted of
murder,
although in theory the death penalty existed for other offenses. During
the Second
World War, for instance, looting was punishable by death, but the
sentence was
never applied. Four individuals were executed for treason after the
war, the most
well-known being William Joyce, "Lord Haw Haw", and the least
well-known a
Private Schurch.
| Year |
Murders |
Exections
in Year |
Executions
Following Year |
| 1940 | 115 | 12 |
11 |
| 1941 | 135 | 11 |
15 |
| 1942 | 159 | 15 |
15 |
| 1943 | 120 | 15 |
9 |
| 1944 | 95 | 9 |
18 |
| 1945 | 141 | 18 |
19 |
The murder rate ("Murder" here means any unlawful killing) in
Britain
between 1918 and 1939 was about 300 per year, in a population of about
45 million,
and the rate was declining (Potter says it was only 100 in the year
1938, page 143).
The clear-up rate then would have been similar to now: over 90 per
cent. Allowing
for those identified but not tried, due to illness, insanity or some
other cause, which
might have reduced 90 per cent to, say, 75 per cent, this must have
meant up to 200
individuals facing trial for their life each year. Juries feeling
merciful might bring in a
verdict of manslaughter, with its maximum sentence of life
imprisonment, but that
would not have been encouraged. Therefore nearly all those convicted
and
sentenced to death would then have experienced the Royal Prerogative of
Mercy
(through the Home Secretary) and have had their sentence commuted to
life
imprisonment. (Bizarrely, the authorities were so concerned that the
"long drop"
could be properly calculated that amputees and the deformed were always
reprieved(3)).
There were 657 executions in the period 1900 - 1949, and
there must have
been somewhere between 5,000 and 15,000 murders: whence it is possible
to
deduce that at its worst or most intense, the ratio of execution to
murder was 1 to 8;
while the smallest figure possible is one execution for every
twenty-three murders. Assuming the average for the 'thirties was the
actual figure for 1938, then there
were one hundred murders and eight executions giving a ratio of 1 to 13
in the year
before the outbreak of World War Two.
Life imprisonment did not necessarily meant "life", but an
indeterminately long
period. The earlier Victorian "ticket of leave man" was someone
released from
prison on license, often after a long period of imprisonment (as, for
instance, was
John "Babbacombe" Lee), and the same sense of being released "on
license"
applies still today, with the possibility of the license being revoked.
Meanwhile, in Northern Ireland, the murder rate of the 1940s
and 1950s was
very low - actually none in some years, but in 1953 there were three
murders. Ian
Hay Gordon was convicted of one of those murders - in 2000 he was
cleared by the
Court of Appeal. Even if the other two murders in 1953 resulted in
valid convictions
this small sample suggests that the judiciary of the period was
satisfied with a clear-up rate that was thirty-three per cent bogus.
There are other cases of the period
which suggest that this was true of the whole of Great Britain.
While seven out of eight convicted murderers (regardless of
sex) had their
sentences commuted this figure hides a gross discrepancy. Capital
sentences were
passed on twenty-eight British women in the twentieth century. If the
seven-eighths
rule applied to them then four women would have been executed. The real
figure
was twelve, with the other sixteen receiving commutation to life. While
the whole
number of women accused was much lower than the number of men, it is
clear that women convicted were
then
executed at more than three times the rate for men, in acts of apparent
gross
disproportion.
In Britain after 1945 the murder rate began to rise until in
the 1960s it
reached the point where it has stayed: 700 to 800 murders per year in a
population
of 50-60 million. In 2003, for example, there were 853 murders(5). Although the number varies
from year to year the upward trend flattened long before the end of the
century. By
comparison the USA(6) currently has had
a
murder rate of about 35,000 per year which,
with a
population five times as large, has continued to be ten times higher
than Britain. However,
the rate in the USA began to decline at the end of the 1990s and In
2002 only16,110 people were murdered(7),
though that was an increase on the year before.
Note:
1. Hanging
In Judgement: Religion
and the Death Penalty in England by Harry Potter (sic)
(London: SCM Press 1993), page
243, quoting the figures from
the report of the 1953 Royal Commission.
|