LIBERALS UPSET BY NATIONALIST ACTIVITY
A simple question. Did six million die in Soviet Russia? Probably,
a lot more. Did six million die in Communist China? Definitely a lot
more. Did six million Germans perish in WW2? Yes, easily on the Eastern
Front and at home by allied bombing. Did six million Boers die in
the Boer War? No, but the atrocities were terrible.
All these questions can be asked without raising too many eyebrows.
You could ask your history teacher, or phone up 'Richard and Judy'
or Points of View and they may not pay you much attention but they
certainly wouldn't call you a hatemonger; and you wouldn't get unwashed
rent-a-mobs outside your house and place of work.
So why the fuss over asking if six million Jews died by gassing in
extermination camps in German occupied Europe? When I was in school
(countless years ago) I remember my history teacher saying that historians
shouldn't be afraid to ask all sorts of questions and look at history
from all angles. What was good enough for first year pupils studying
the Romans must surely also apply to professors studying 20th Century
And even worse - it is even illegal to ask this particular question
re. European Jewry (though not about the other mass deaths in other
Nations) in some countries. "WHAT? Wrong to ask questions about history?"
you cry - yes indeed. And now the government want to do the same in
So, we've established that it's a question we're not supposed to ask.
Now we have to, like my old history teacher would say, ask "Why is
War, we're told in liberal societies, is a terrible thing. And indeed
it is, unless one is defending one's homeland or faith from an aggressor,
war must be avoided at all costs. Especially as war now involves whole
populations. Gone are the days when soldiers faced soldiers; now men,
women and children all too often suffer the consequences of war.
Too many wars have been fought for International Capitalism. The Boer
War, WW1, WW2 and even the Gulf War. None of these was justified from
a British point of view. All were used to secure gains for international
finance whilst jingoism was used to rally the folks back home. But,
after WW1, questions were raised, such as "was it worth it?" or "what
did we really fight for?"
Our lords and masters were determined that no such questions should
be raised after WW2. Of course they had the advantage of WW2 being
a "Crusade Against Fascism" - but they had to devise something a little
more convincing if the people were to be kept in line.
Thus it served two purposes when the film of emaciated corpses came
back to Britain. International Zionism couldn't have hoped for better
propaganda as they fought to secure "Israel" and began their terror
campaign against the Palestinians and the British and the British
propaganda team weren't going to miss this gift wrapped opportunity
Now, before people start screaming and fainting out in suburbia let's
get one thing straight - Jews did die in those camps and those pictures,
for the most part, were genuine. All revisionists are asking is "Did
six million really die?" They might argue that it was only three million
- or just 100,000 - but where is the crime in seeking the truth? There
is also the matter of how those poor, unfortunates died. Was it a
planned extermination or were there just too many prisoners at a time
when Germany was being overrun by refugees fleeing the Red Army and
carpet bombed by the 'Allies' - and with typhoid and cholera epidemics,
was death on a large scale unavoidable?
If we want the truth about the Holocaust (yes, one would be forgiven
for thinking only one "crime" on such an alleged scale had taken place
this century) - why should we be afraid to ask open questions? Why
should we ban the asking of questions?
Doesn't that show that there is something to fear from historians
looking into such matters?
For those interested in looking at the Revisionist case we recommend
the booklet 'Did Six Million Really Die?' and other revisionist works
- available from
Those on the
internet can begin by visiting the